capifan

La forma de organizar el blog

· Manual del blog:

o https://www.dropbox.com/s/apkvb1t286fqngx/manual_del_blog.docx?dl=0

· Nuevo calendario de exposiciones:

o https://www.dropbox.com/s/t5go92oidqcdzyg/nuevo_calendario_exposiciones.png?dl=0

· El link de las presentaciones:

o https://www.dropbox.com/s/qs4lk2cssc3pn25/Geoestrategia.pptx?dl=0

· Documento a leer J JOE:

o https://www.dropbox.com/s/shqk1z833rp4gd9/joe2010.pdf?dl=0

· Reporte de seguridad de Munich

o https://www.dropbox.com/s/ng9br4q5wl7eavj/MunichSecurityReport2017.pdf?dl=0

· Presentación de China

o https://www.dropbox.com/s/jyaipjtr7svfz69/china.pptx?dl=0

lunes, 19 de septiembre de 2016

(21) ASEAN: Obama Reaffirms US Role in South China Sea

http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/news/2016/09/mil-160908-voa04.htm?_m=3n.002a.1813.mg0ao016xv.1o17
Publicadas por Chinampa Digital a la/s 8:51 p.m. No hay comentarios.:
Enviar esto por correo electrónicoBlogThis!Compartir en XCompartir en FacebookCompartir en Pinterest

(20) Britain's Status as a Declining Power Confirmed at G20

https://sputniknews.com/analysis/20160907/1045047968/g20-britain-status-decline.html
Publicadas por Chinampa Digital a la/s 8:50 p.m. No hay comentarios.:
Enviar esto por correo electrónicoBlogThis!Compartir en XCompartir en FacebookCompartir en Pinterest

(19) Los Rothschild han perdido el control sobre la economía mundial | Katehon think tank. Geopolitics & Tradition

http://katehon.com/es/article/los-rothschild-han-perdido-el-control-sobre-la-economia-mundial
Publicadas por Chinampa Digital a la/s 8:49 p.m. No hay comentarios.:
Enviar esto por correo electrónicoBlogThis!Compartir en XCompartir en FacebookCompartir en Pinterest

(18) South China Sea row tops ASEAN summit agenda - News from Al Jazeera

http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2016/09/south-china-sea-row-tops-asean-summit-agenda-160908052213165.html?utm_source=phplist184&utm_medium=email&utm_content=HTML&utm_campaign=Political+Anticipation+-+A+Press+Review+by+LEAP
Publicadas por Chinampa Digital a la/s 8:48 p.m. No hay comentarios.:
Enviar esto por correo electrónicoBlogThis!Compartir en XCompartir en FacebookCompartir en Pinterest

(17) ¿Qué es esa 'misteriosa sustancia verde' que Hillary Clinton escupe en un vaso de agua? (Video) - RT

https://actualidad.rt.com/actualidad/218123-misteriosa-sustancia-verde-escupir-tos-clinton
Publicadas por Chinampa Digital a la/s 8:47 p.m. No hay comentarios.:
Enviar esto por correo electrónicoBlogThis!Compartir en XCompartir en FacebookCompartir en Pinterest

(16) The Transatlantic Trade & Investment Partnership (TTIP) Is Dead | Covert Geopolitics

https://geopolitics.co/2016/09/07/the-transatlantic-trade-and-investment-partnership-ttip-is-dead/

Good News for the People of Europe: The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) Is Dead. Negotiations have Failed.

TTIP
The German Minister of Economy and Vice-Chancellor, Mr. Sigmar Gabriel, a few days ago has declared that the European Union should not submit to the demands of the United States, referring to the negotiations on the TTIP (Transatlantic Trade and Investments Partnership). He said the negotiations failed. By saying so, he joined French Prime Minister, Manuel Valls, as well as French Secretary of State for External Trade, Mr. Matthias Fekl.
Negotiations started in 2013. After 14 ‘rounds’ of talks dealing with 27 points, no agreement has been reached, none whatsoever, leading to the conclusion that the deal is dead. Even though Mme. Merkel defended the treaty with all her heart up to the end of July 2016, both Germany and France now request a definite end to the negotiations.
The collapse of the TTIP is one of the best news for Europe – and I mean the people of Europe – in recent times; an initiative of the two major players in the EU. This decision has several meanings:
1. European countries are gradually taking back their sovereignty from Brussels and decide for themselves what is good for them and for Europe;
2. With a failed TTIP Europe escapes, or avoids, being enslaved by US corporatism, financial institutions – and US legislation;
3. Europe may now continue making its proper policies on socioeconomy, environment, food safety, agriculture — and
4. Europe is now freer to pursue its own monetary policy. Under the grip of the TTIP, it would have been difficult, say impossible, to adopt a monetary policy outside of the Euro which many countries would like, openly or covertly – some without making a lot of noise for fear of being ‘reprimanded’ by Brussels.
The fact that authorities of both, France and Germany, stated in unison that the negotiations failed, is a sign that there is still a spirit of autonomy in Europe. What is called ‘negotiations’ were never really negotiations – a give and take between equal partners. It was from the beginning a one-way street, where the exceptional nation imposed its rules. There was no way of getting the slightest concession from them – not an iota.
No doubt Washington had no intention to share any of the benefits of this ‘Free Trade Agreement’ with Europe. The exceptional people wanted it all. For example, the term ‘Appelation Contrôlée’ for wine and cheese in France and other European countries, used to protect the farmers of a given region – would have disappeared. The US wanted everything to be open for the ever dictating ‘market’. Nothing was to be clearly defined, as far as Europe was concerned. No transparence – just a vast base for cheating, consumers and nations.
TTIP talks were held in top secret, behind closed doors. Not even politicians, let alone the public at large which eventually would have had to bear the consequences of the deal, had access to the documents being ‘negotiated’. – It showed the Machiavellian nature of empire at its best.
China knew very well why they were not even interested in participating in the TPP (Transpacific Partnership), a similar trade agreement with eleven Pacific nations and the US.
Let’s recall the key point that would have meant disaster for Europe:
– A private corporate tribunal that would have had supremacy over sovereign government legislation. For example, the tribunal could have imposed ‘sanctions’ or fines on governments, whose legislation, say for health, environmental protection and other social reasons, would have reduced corporations’ profit margins.
– Similar in the banking sector, monetary policy would have been firmly dictated by the FED, Wall Street (i.e. Goldman Sachs – see Greece and the head of the ECB, a former GS exec) and the European Central Bank. This for now is still the case, but with an unsustainable and unreformable EU and Euro, both are destined to disappear sooner or later. It is likely that many countries are already quietly and clandestinely arranging for “Plan B” – preparing exit strategies. Indeed, since BREXIT, there are numerous political movements to this effect under way – and this not only in the most devastatingly affected southern European countries, but also in northern Europe.
– Agriculture policy would have been dictated by Washington, especially with regard to GMOs and ag-subsidies. Monsanto and the like would have had free access to all of Europe, and none of the EU members could have passed legislation prohibiting genetically modified seeds.
– Standards for health and nutrition would have been imposed by Washington, i.e.  by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Most of these standards are considerably weaker than European equivalents, potentially exposing European citizens to greater health risks than current EU standards foresee.
– Labor laws would have been weakened in according to US standards which foresee virtually no protection for workers. The Brussels imposed new labor law in France, dubbed as the ‘El Khomri law’, after the French Minister of Labor, Myriam El Khomri, would reduce significantly French labor rights, fought for and attained with decades of efforts – literally sweat and tears – by French workers and unions. The new French labor law, signed as a decree by PM Manuel Valls under a dubious special provision in the Constitution (instead of being passed through Parliament), was a precursor for things to come in the rest of Europe – had the TTIP gone forward. This controversial law is currently at the demand of more than 60 French Parliamentarians being reviewed by the French Conseil d’Etat (equivalent to other countries’ Supreme Court) and may quite possibly be either canceled or sent to Parliament for a decision. Now that the TTIP is dead, it is possible that the law will be repealed.
The day the TTIP died was a great day for Europe. Although Europe is far from being out of the woods. Her own problems keep piling up, many of them also a direct or indirect consequence of empire.
To mention just a few –
  • immigration from US-NATO war-destroyed countries;
  • the never ending financial cum economic crisis;
  • the complete absence of solidarity among EU nations;
  • the lack of EU countries’ sovereignty; the missing EU Constitution giving member countries a common perspective and political agenda;
  • the increasing (‘false flag’) terror attacks throughout Europe; – and not least NATO – which through its aggression towards Russia is increasingly becoming a risk of war – of WWIII – that would for the third time in 100 years devastate Europe.
This time the rest of the world would very likely not be spared. Many countries are conscious of this danger and would like to get out of NATO, but don’t dare say so, because of fear from the boots of Washington.
Let’s hope the death of the TTIP will bring a new breeze of fresh air and ideas into European sovereignty.
This article is in part based on an TV debate sponsored by PressTV, French Edition.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/good-news-for-the-people-of-europe-the-transatlantic-trade-and-investment-partnership-ttip-is-dead-negotiations-have-failed/5544425
Aside from the fiat monetary scam and bloodsoaked petrodollar, another significant source of funds for the Nazionist Khazarian Mafia is the “healthcare” industry which registered a whopping $3.09 trillion in 2014, and is projected to soar to $3.57 trillion in 2017, in the US alone. We believe that this is just a conservative figure.
We can avoid using drugs, defeat any viral attack and scaremongering, like the Zika virus, easily by knowing how to build our own comprehensive antiviral system. Find more about how we can kill three birds with one stone, right here.
Publicadas por Chinampa Digital a la/s 8:46 p.m. No hay comentarios.:
Enviar esto por correo electrónicoBlogThis!Compartir en XCompartir en FacebookCompartir en Pinterest

(15) India watches anxiously as Chinese influence grows — FT.com

https://www.ft.com/content/e9baebee-0bd8-11e6-9456-444ab5211a2f

India watches anxiously as Chinese influence grows

Talk of a new Silk Road may be intended to evoke romantic, non-threatening images of desert caravans, ancient ships and trade in exotic commodities. But China’s grand plan for a network of railways, highways, pipelines and ports across central Asia, and around Southeast Asia is generating anxiety in New Delhi.
With the 3,488km border between the two Asian neighbours still a matter of formal dispute, Indian strategic policy analysts are divided on whether China’s new Silk Road project is a strategic and economic threat to their country — or an opportunity. Many see the project — which the Chinese have called One Belt, One Road (OBOR) — as something that must be carefully navigated, as Beijing develops large projects in countries that India considers part of its natural sphere of influence. However, New Delhi lacks the financial power to offer a credible alternative.
“The Indian government is very careful about the way it handles the China rhetoric, and it isn’t ready to come out arms swinging against OBOR, but it is sitting with its arms folded making it very clear that it will not endorse the project if it doesn’t like the way it was put together as a Chinese fait accompli,” says Shashank Joshi, a senior research fellow at the Royal United Services Institute, a British defence and security think-tank.
“They cannot be seen to be outwardly hostile to a scheme which many smaller Asian neighbours view as a good opportunity for large flows of Chinese capital that India cannot deliver,” he says.
Brahma Chellaney, professor of strategic studies at New Delhi’s Centre for Policy Research, sees China’s new Silk Road initiative as a repackaging — in more palatable terms — of China’s so-called “string of pearls” strategy, which India views as an attempt to strategically encircle it.
The “string of pearls” theory argues that Chinese investment in ports in south Asia is a precursor to developing overseas naval bases. China has, for example, already built a major port atHambantota in Sri Lanka, which overlooks important shipping lanes that carry much of the world’s oil trade, and which India views as strategically important for its own defence.
The visit of Chinese submarines at the Colombo port in 2014 raised fears that the facility’s purpose is not economic but military. Chinese investment is also planned for ports in Bangladesh and Myanmar, raising concerns that they may serve a dual purpose.
“The new Silk Road is just a nice new name for the strategy they’ve been pursuing,” says Mr Chellaney. “They’ve wrapped that strategy in more benign terms. The Chinese dream is pre-eminence in Asia, and this goes to the heart of that dream.”
“It’s not just a trade initiative,” he says. “What China is doing has a strategic element that is increasingly obvious.”
India is most exercised about plans for a $46bn economic corridor linking China and Pakistan, India’s nuclear-armed neighbour and rival. That blueprint envisions goods travelling from China’s western region to Pakistan’s Gwadar, a once sleepy Arabian Sea port now run by the China Overseas Port Holding Company. It is considered a staging point between central Asia and the Gulf.
Part of the corridor will pass through Pakistan-held Kashmir, a territory that is still the subject of a decades-old, unresolved dispute between India and Pakistan. Indian analysts say that acceptance of the corridor would effectively acknowledge Pakistan’s rights over the territory now under its control, while India’s own claims over Kashmir have yet to be resolved — something New Delhi considers unacceptable. “This is a large scale project bringing People’s Liberation Army personnel [said to be guarding some project locations] right into the heart of what India considers to be occupied territory,” Mr Joshi says.
“India is careful about the way it handles the China rhetoric,” says Shashank Joshi, fellow at Rusi
At a recent conference in Gwadar, Pakistan’s Army Chief, General Raheel Sharif, accused India of deliberately attempting to undermine the project. “India, our neighbour, has openly challenged this development initiative,” he said. “We will not allow anyone to create impediments or turbulence in any parts of Pakistan.”
But wary as India may be of Chinese ambitions, analysts say New Delhi needs to take a measured approach to the new Silk Road, and embrace individual components.
India is already a member of the Chinese-led Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank, which will finance much of the infrastructure, potentially giving it some leverage over how the plan unfolds.
“For every belt they create, and every road that we create, can we create a slip road that connects Indian opportunities to the larger global market rather than reject it outright?” asks Samir Saran, of the Observer Research Foundation. “Can we … use their institutions to our own advantage?”
Publicadas por Chinampa Digital a la/s 8:44 p.m. No hay comentarios.:
Enviar esto por correo electrónicoBlogThis!Compartir en XCompartir en FacebookCompartir en Pinterest
Entradas más recientes Entradas antiguas Página Principal
Suscribirse a: Entradas (Atom)

Acerca de mí

Mi foto
Chinampa Digital
Ver mi perfil completo

Archivo del Blog

  • ▼  2017 (594)
    • ▼  30 abr - 7 may (3)
      • (25) McCain: North Korea first 'real test' of Trum...
      • (24) Pravda: China sides with Russia on Syria and...
      • (23) La Jornada: Trump y su patio trasero
    • ►  23 abr - 30 abr (28)
    • ►  16 abr - 23 abr (90)
    • ►  9 abr - 16 abr (52)
    • ►  2 abr - 9 abr (19)
    • ►  26 mar - 2 abr (20)
    • ►  19 mar - 26 mar (32)
    • ►  12 mar - 19 mar (31)
    • ►  5 mar - 12 mar (50)
    • ►  26 feb - 5 mar (40)
    • ►  19 feb - 26 feb (70)
    • ►  12 feb - 19 feb (54)
    • ►  5 feb - 12 feb (82)
    • ►  29 ene - 5 feb (23)
  • ►  2016 (373)
    • ►  27 nov - 4 dic (2)
    • ►  20 nov - 27 nov (26)
    • ►  13 nov - 20 nov (57)
    • ►  6 nov - 13 nov (28)
    • ►  30 oct - 6 nov (21)
    • ►  23 oct - 30 oct (8)
    • ►  16 oct - 23 oct (14)
    • ►  9 oct - 16 oct (12)
    • ►  2 oct - 9 oct (18)
    • ►  25 sept - 2 oct (28)
    • ►  18 sept - 25 sept (74)
    • ►  4 sept - 11 sept (55)
    • ►  21 ago - 28 ago (30)
Tema Simple. Con tecnología de Blogger.